At a glance
- Period
- 20th–21st century
- Place
- Switzerland
The watchmaking story
A useful place to start with Elmar Mock's work is Original Swatch. 2
Elmar Mock worked for or held a role at ETA. 1234
Elmar Mock designed, developed or supplied work for Swatch. 1234
Recognition: European Inventor Award 2017 finalist; Prix Gaïa, Craftsmanship-Creation, 2010 23
Scope: Direct watchmaking
Why this person is included
Documented original work
Background and working context
Affiliations and workshops: ETA; Swatch development 2
Geographic ties: Switzerland. Documented workplace / industry location
Brands, workshops, and other relationships
- Movement / component supplier or manufacturer · Inherited source-linked record; relationship classification reviewed, sources not reopened
ETA — Worked for / held role. Watch development engineer 1234
Legacy affiliation: ETA; Swatch development. Person-level contribution: Co-developed the original Swatch with Jacques Müller, contributing polymer manufacturing and ultrasonic-welding techniques.
Original affiliation wording: ETA; Swatch development. No present-day employment or ownership inferred.
- Watch brand / watchmaking business · Inherited source-linked record; relationship classification reviewed, sources not reopened
Swatch — Designed / developed / supplied for. Co-development with Jacques Müller 1234
Legacy affiliation: ETA; Swatch development. Person-level contribution: Co-developed the original Swatch with Jacques Müller, contributing polymer manufacturing and ultrasonic-welding techniques.
Original affiliation wording: ETA; Swatch development. No present-day employment or ownership inferred.
Other people linked to the same brands
- Ernst Thomke — ETA, Swatch
- Jacques Müller — ETA, Swatch
- Nicolas G. Hayek — Swatch
Evidence and limitations
This dossier connects 6 field-specific evidence records with 4 public sources. Known links only; full career not established
Claim qualifications (6)
- Noteworthy contribution: Shared invention; no claim to sole authorship. 2
- Representative work: Shared invention; no claim to sole authorship. 2
- Affiliations / workshops: Shared invention; no claim to sole authorship. 2
- Specific role: Shared invention; no claim to sole authorship. 2
- Recognition: Shared invention; no claim to sole authorship. 2
- Recognition: The mapping supports this award clause only, not other recognition or biographical fields. Locator: 2010 laureates, Craftsmanship-Creation. 3
Sources
- Swatch — historyWikipedia · Encyclopedia / tertiary · Not stated
[S0151] Wikipedia. "Swatch — history." Not stated. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch Accessed 2026-09-13.
Source context
Relationship to subject: Tertiary compilation
How it was checked: Page opened; relevant text read
Limitation: Company history identifies individual contributors; no current executive titles are inferred.
- Elmar MockEuropean Patent Office · Institutional / association · Not stated
[S0163] European Patent Office. "Elmar Mock." Not stated. https://www.epo.org/en/news-events/european-inventor-award/meet-the-finalists/elmar-mock Accessed 2026-09-13.
Source context
Relationship to subject: Awarding patent institution
How it was checked: Page opened; relevant text read
Limitation: 2017 award profile; historic statistics and current-job language are not treated as 2026 facts.
- The laureates since 1993Musée international d'horlogerie · Award-organizer record · Not stated
[S0290] Musée international d'horlogerie. "The laureates since 1993." Not stated. https://www.mih.ch/en/the-laureats/ Accessed 2026-09-13. Locator: Award year and category, individually matched
Source context
Relationship to subject: Award organizer's own results list
How it was checked: Opened and text inspected
Limitation: Supports named recognition only. Roger Smith (2016 History-research) is not automatically Roger W. Smith the watchmaker.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch https://www.epo.org/en/news-events/european-inventor-award/meet-the-finalists/elmar-mock https://www.mih.ch/en/the-laureats/linked source
Corrections and stronger evidence
Names, dates, and workshop relationships can change as archives are digitised. If you have a primary source that clarifies this record, use the correction process.
Submit supporting evidence