At a glance
- Period
- 19th–20th century
- Place
- Switzerland
The watchmaking story
A useful place to start with François Borgel's work is Screw-down watch case. 1
François Borgel case-making practice is the name recorded for François Borgel's own watchmaking practice. 1
Scope: Direct watchmaking
Why this person is included
Documented original work
Background and working context
Affiliations and workshops: Genevan case manufacture
Geographic ties: Switzerland. Documented workplace / industry location
Brands, workshops, and other relationships
- Watch brand / watchmaking business · Inherited source-linked record; relationship classification reviewed, sources not reopened
François Borgel case-making practice — Own watchmaking practice. Screw-down protective watch cases; legal trading name not established 1
Legacy affiliation: Genevan case manufacture. Person-level contribution: Developed screw-down protective watch-case construction.
Original affiliation wording: Genevan case manufacture. No present-day employment or ownership inferred.
Evidence and limitations
This dossier connects 2 field-specific evidence records with 1 public source. Known links only; full career not established
Claim qualifications (2)
- Noteworthy contribution: Chronology supports the scoped association; national/world-first and exclusive-inventor claims are not independently established. Locator: Screw-down-case entry; no priority/date adopted 1
- Representative work: Chronology supports the scoped association; national/world-first and exclusive-inventor claims are not independently established. Locator: Screw-down-case entry; no priority/date adopted 1
Sources
- History of timeFondation Haute Horlogerie · Institutional / association · Not stated
[S0133] Fondation Haute Horlogerie. "History of time." Not stated. https://www.hautehorlogerie.org/en/watches-and-culture/history Accessed 2026-09-13.
Source context
Relationship to subject: Associated professional body
How it was checked: Opened and read
Limitation: Condensed institutional timeline. Priority claims are not treated as comprehensive patent-history findings. Post-consolidation gap-resolution pass: Foundation chronology is supporting attribution, not an inspected patent or proof of sole/first invention. Historical priority and dating require independent records.
Corrections and stronger evidence
Names, dates, and workshop relationships can change as archives are digitised. If you have a primary source that clarifies this record, use the correction process.
Submit supporting evidence