At a glance
- Period
- 19th century
- Place
- Switzerland
The watchmaking story
A useful place to start with Georges-Auguste Leschot's work is Watchmaking pantograph. 1
Georges-Auguste Leschot worked for or held a role at Vacheron & Constantin. 1
Scope: Direct watchmaking
Why this person is included
Documented original work
Background and working context
Affiliations and workshops: Vacheron & Constantin
Geographic ties: Switzerland. Documented workplace / industry location
Brands, workshops, and other relationships
- Watch brand / watchmaking business · Inherited source-linked record; relationship classification reviewed, sources not reopened
Vacheron & Constantin — Worked for / held role. Watchmaker / production inventor 1
Legacy affiliation: Vacheron & Constantin. Person-level contribution: Developed a pantograph used in precision watch-component manufacture.
Original affiliation wording: Vacheron & Constantin. No present-day employment or ownership inferred.
Other people linked to the same brands
- Anita Porchet — Vacheron Constantin
- Jean-Marc Vacheron — Vacheron Constantin
Evidence and limitations
This dossier connects 2 field-specific evidence records with 1 public source. Known links only; full career not established
Claim qualifications (2)
- Noteworthy contribution: Chronology supports the scoped association; national/world-first and exclusive-inventor claims are not independently established. Locator: 1839 pantograph entry 1
- Representative work: Chronology supports the scoped association; national/world-first and exclusive-inventor claims are not independently established. Locator: 1839 pantograph entry 1
Sources
- History of timeFondation Haute Horlogerie · Institutional / association · Not stated
[S0133] Fondation Haute Horlogerie. "History of time." Not stated. https://www.hautehorlogerie.org/en/watches-and-culture/history Accessed 2026-09-13.
Source context
Relationship to subject: Associated professional body
How it was checked: Opened and read
Limitation: Condensed institutional timeline. Priority claims are not treated as comprehensive patent-history findings. Post-consolidation gap-resolution pass: Foundation chronology is supporting attribution, not an inspected patent or proof of sole/first invention. Historical priority and dating require independent records.
Corrections and stronger evidence
Names, dates, and workshop relationships can change as archives are digitised. If you have a primary source that clarifies this record, use the correction process.
Submit supporting evidence