Watchmaker profile

Song I-yeong

Scholarly research attributes development of a weight-driven armillary clock in 1669 to Song, an astronomy professor at Gwansanggam. 1

Abstract and bibliographic metadata only. The later museum object’s identity and provenance are not conclusively assigned here; full 2018 biographical study was not recovered.

At a glance

Dates
The accessed abstract gives 1619–1692. Numeric life dates are withheld pending comparison with later biographical research.
Also known as
Song I-Yeong, 宋以穎

The watchmaking story

A useful place to start with Song I-yeong's work is 1669 armillary-clock development. 1

Sources connect Song I-yeong with Gwansanggam (Joseon Bureau of Astronomy), without establishing a formal role. 1

Scope: Broader horology 1

Why this person is included

Documented attributable individual contribution

Background and working context

Affiliations and workshops: Gwansanggam (Joseon Bureau of Astronomy) 1

Geographic ties: Joseon Korea; modern South Korean research and heritage context. Modern geographic grouping for historical Joseon activity; not modern nationality

Brands, workshops, and other relationships

  1. Institution / education / public service · Inherited source-linked record; relationship classification reviewed, sources not reopened

    Gwansanggam (Joseon Bureau of Astronomy) — Institutional association — role not established. Astronomer / astronomical-clock developer 1

    Legacy affiliation: Gwansanggam (Joseon Bureau of Astronomy). Person-level contribution: Scholarly research attributes development of a weight-driven armillary clock in 1669 to Song, an astronomy professor at Gwansanggam.

    Original affiliation wording: Gwansanggam (Joseon Bureau of Astronomy). No present-day employment or ownership inferred.

Evidence and limitations

This dossier connects 8 field-specific evidence records with 1 public source. Known links only; full career not established; unresolved relationship(s) remain

Claim qualifications (8)
  • Full name: Abstract/metadata only. No life-date mapping and no conclusive attribution of the extant museum object. 1
  • Noteworthy contribution: Abstract/metadata only. No life-date mapping and no conclusive attribution of the extant museum object. 1
  • Representative work: Abstract/metadata only. No life-date mapping and no conclusive attribution of the extant museum object. 1
  • Affiliations / workshops: Abstract/metadata only. No life-date mapping and no conclusive attribution of the extant museum object. 1
  • Specific role: Abstract/metadata only. No life-date mapping and no conclusive attribution of the extant museum object. 1
  • Era: Abstract/metadata only. No life-date mapping and no conclusive attribution of the extant museum object. 1
  • Scope: Abstract/metadata only. No life-date mapping and no conclusive attribution of the extant museum object. 1
  • Primary geography: Abstract/metadata only. No life-date mapping and no conclusive attribution of the extant museum object. 1

Sources

  1. Song I-Yeong’s Armillary ClockSang Hyuk Kim; Yong Sam Lee · Springer — Handbook of Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy · Scholarly research chapter — abstract accessed · 2015 volume, pp. 2179–2195; online metadata dated 2014; DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-6141-8_249

    [S0327] Sang Hyuk Kim; Yong Sam Lee. Springer — Handbook of Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy. "Song I-Yeong’s Armillary Clock." 2015 volume, pp. 2179–2195; online metadata dated 2014; DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-6141-8_249. https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-1-4614-6141-8_249 Accessed 2026-09-13. Locator: Abstract: 1669 construction, Gwansanggam and armillary-clock mechanism. Access scope: abstract and bibliographic metadata only; full chapter not inspected.

    Source context

    Relationship to subject: Researchers examining the historical instrument

    How it was checked: Opened — abstract / metadata only. Abstract: 1669 construction, Gwansanggam and armillary-clock mechanism

    Limitation: Only the abstract and metadata were available. Civil dates and identification of the surviving museum object require full comparison with later research; no dates filled.

Corrections and stronger evidence

Names, dates, and workshop relationships can change as archives are digitised. If you have a primary source that clarifies this record, use the correction process.

Submit supporting evidence